Edit: Stolen from a website. Didn't have time to note it until now. The difference between us and gun control people: they see tonight's news, and that's as far as they're thinking- We're thinking hundreds of years into the future.
Here’s a history of what happens after governments have disarmed their citizens:
1911 – Turkey disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1915 – 1917 they murdered 1.5 million Armenians.
1929 – Russia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1929 – 1953 they murdered 20 million Russians.
1935 – China disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1948 – 1952 they murdered 20 million Chinese.
1938 – Germany disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1939 – 1945 they murdered 16 million Jews.
1956 – Cambodia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1975 – 1977 they murdered 1 million Educated people.
1964 – Guatamala disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1964 – 1981 they murdered 100,000 Mayan Indians.
1970 – Uganda disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1971 – 1979 they murdered 300,000 Christians.
[Editor: You can argue about the numbers, but the point here is that disarmed citizens are vulnerable, and that there are many historical examples of disarmed citizens being killed and oppressed by their own government. The excuse given by authorities that they need to take guns away from citizens in order to lower crime rates is not supported by facts. Even if a government does not turn on its own citizens after disarming them, people are less safe – because unarmed citizens are easy targets to criminals. Over and over again, it has been clearly shown that taking guns away from citizens does not lead to a decrease in crime but rather a dramatic increase.]
Australia has disarmed it’s citizens, and a year later the homicide rate in the largest province is up 300%. The burglaries of seniors is “dramatically” up.
I guess the criminals did not turn their weapons in. Only the innocent law abiding citizens turned in weapons.
In US cities with the highest crime rates, taking guns away from the citizens has not lowered the homicide rate. All it has done is to make it easier for criminals to operate.
The 2nd amendment is not about duck hunting, or deer hunting. It is about having the ability and the right to defend oneself and your family. It doesn’t matter if that threat is a burglar, or the Federal Government. A disarmed population is fair game for any president who may be aspiring to become a dictator. Having its citizens armed was the plain and simple intent of the founding fathers of our country.
I mean, you have to be beyond delusional to believe that your puny guns would help anything if your government suddenly went all "Hey guys, you know what? Fuck you, days of freedom are over, we North Korea II now!"
Vietnam had nothing to do with guns and everything to do with complete inexperience in the jungle and having far inferior knowledge of the land.
Also idk how strict you want your gun control, but there are plenty of developed countries today that heavily restrict guns and have a lower crime rate, I believe Britain is one but I don't remember for sure.
more boring than cringy even, its like every second i watch i think "oh lord what will he pull off this time, maybe the AMAZING mouth shot hes done 9 times in the last 2 minutes? (and then he does it)"
Arin facfacecam :)
im going to esl for sunday
I just want to take a photo with arteezy tbh
Get some cos players
florian reply to steam mssgs plz
dotabuff a.k.a how TripleSteal yells at florian.
Florian is busy eating family size pizza
cant u use a phone wtf
needs camera to take pic in 2018 ROFL
my phone camera is dogshit
I'll try
when cookie posts a guide about how not to lose late game to a better late game team, but you just played the perfect counter example.
chill
arin take nudes with camera and give it back to ur friend FeelsOkayMan
ywn i bought 2 family pizzas btw
its too much i ate 3/4 of 1 pizza and i alrdy feel like throwing up PepeHands
moron
What idiot buys 2 pizzas for one person ROFL
they were the biggest size they had, if they had a bigger size id have ordered that one instead
why would you buy even bigger pizzas if you couldnt even finish the two of this size
what r u saying good sir
alright fuck this
3 hours of sleep must be enough, i suppose i fell asleep around midnight and got up a while ago randomly
id just take 1 of the bigger pizzas lol
how big are these inadequate pizzas?
as big as ur mom LOL haHAA
haha xDddd roasted 😂😂😂👌
current pizzas are 40 cm diameter each
that's smaller than my dick
me
2 conduct summaries with <3 reports BrokeBack still f behavior score BrokeBack
Edit: Stolen from a website. Didn't have time to note it until now. The difference between us and gun control people: they see tonight's news, and that's as far as they're thinking- We're thinking hundreds of years into the future.
Here’s a history of what happens after governments have disarmed their citizens:
1911 – Turkey disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1915 – 1917 they murdered 1.5 million Armenians.
1929 – Russia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1929 – 1953 they murdered 20 million Russians.
1935 – China disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1948 – 1952 they murdered 20 million Chinese.
1938 – Germany disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1939 – 1945 they murdered 16 million Jews.
1956 – Cambodia disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1975 – 1977 they murdered 1 million Educated people.
1964 – Guatamala disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1964 – 1981 they murdered 100,000 Mayan Indians.
1970 – Uganda disarmed it’s citizens, and between 1971 – 1979 they murdered 300,000 Christians.
[Editor: You can argue about the numbers, but the point here is that disarmed citizens are vulnerable, and that there are many historical examples of disarmed citizens being killed and oppressed by their own government. The excuse given by authorities that they need to take guns away from citizens in order to lower crime rates is not supported by facts. Even if a government does not turn on its own citizens after disarming them, people are less safe – because unarmed citizens are easy targets to criminals. Over and over again, it has been clearly shown that taking guns away from citizens does not lead to a decrease in crime but rather a dramatic increase.]
Australia has disarmed it’s citizens, and a year later the homicide rate in the largest province is up 300%. The burglaries of seniors is “dramatically” up.
I guess the criminals did not turn their weapons in. Only the innocent law abiding citizens turned in weapons.
In US cities with the highest crime rates, taking guns away from the citizens has not lowered the homicide rate. All it has done is to make it easier for criminals to operate.
The 2nd amendment is not about duck hunting, or deer hunting. It is about having the ability and the right to defend oneself and your family. It doesn’t matter if that threat is a burglar, or the Federal Government. A disarmed population is fair game for any president who may be aspiring to become a dictator. Having its citizens armed was the plain and simple intent of the founding fathers of our country.
why does he even imply that gun control = disarming all citizens?
not that either one of those things would happen in the us anyway
KKona Clap
his original argument was that because people in us have guns there wont ever be a dictator in their country
fake
well hes a smart person unlike u
Should I buy my assault rifle for 95€ after my service? If yes, why?
if u like shooting sports i guess yes
otehrwise no, for wat?
I mean it's a good prize but I dont think I'll ever use it, for now shooting has been a shit experience because of the weather.
i mean 95€ is nothing for u zurich boys anyway, so might as well get it
question is how much ull have to pay for ammo and whether ull ever use it
I mean, you have to be beyond delusional to believe that your puny guns would help anything if your government suddenly went all "Hey guys, you know what? Fuck you, days of freedom are over, we North Korea II now!"
Sure, the context of a war that ended more than 40 years ago in a country that wasn't exactly developed is a good argument.
Vietnam had nothing to do with guns and everything to do with complete inexperience in the jungle and having far inferior knowledge of the land.
Also idk how strict you want your gun control, but there are plenty of developed countries today that heavily restrict guns and have a lower crime rate, I believe Britain is one but I don't remember for sure.
That being said it's probably blown out of proportion considering that world violence is on a downward trend for ages and is still trending downwards.
this MIGHT be theuir worst video yet(untul their next one that is)
it is physically hard to watch not because of chris but ethan himself
Physically hard?
Do u get Ethan spasms when u watch it?
physically hard = cringy and boring
more boring than cringy even, its like every second i watch i think "oh lord what will he pull off this time, maybe the AMAZING mouth shot hes done 9 times in the last 2 minutes? (and then he does it)"
holy shit this is GOOD
i mean he said he wants to do standup comedy
im sure itll be garbage
if the first 4 minutes i managed to watch represent his (stand up (comedy)) then ive seen enough